2345678美元娱乐化出价，面对巴菲特午餐

经常看到这种完全没做功课的文章，不知道该说什么。 1. 这不是娱乐化出价，因为这个出价和出价人其实无关，搞不懂这个就写文章的难成好记者； 2.这个盖伊。斯皮尔不知道是谁，不知道为什么会出现在这里，应该也是作者的错； 3.物美涨和这顿饭没关系。

Source: http://nteswjq.blog.163.com/blog/static/126998120115903106/

$2,345,678, an entertainment-style bid to face Buffett at lunch

> By Duan Yongping · his NetEase blog (nteswjq.blog.163.com, now closed; read from web archives) · 2011-06-09 · [Original link](http://nteswjq.blog.163.com/blog/static/126998120115903106/) ([archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20110613010249/http://nteswjq.blog.163.com:80/blog/static/126998120115903106/))

> This post includes letters from others or quoted material; Duan Yongping's own words are marked separately.

I often see articles like this where no homework was done at all; I don't know what to say.

1. This is not an entertainment-style bid, because the bid actually has nothing to do with the bidder; someone who writes an article without understanding this is unlikely to become a good reporter;

2. I don't know who this Guy Spier is or why he appears here; that should also be the writer's mistake;

3. Wumart's rise has nothing to do with this meal.

http://zjdaily.zjol.com.cn/jrzb/html/2011-06/08/content_885764.htm?div=-1

[Here the original reposted the Today Morning Express report; it is not Duan Yongping's words and is not included. See the archived page linked at the top.]

2345678美元 娱乐化出价，面对巴菲特午餐

$2,345,678, an entertainment-style bid to face Buffett at lunch

2345678美元娱乐化出价，面对巴菲特午餐