功夫熊猫3

旅行中，不方便上电脑，故简单写几句。首先，在支付宝事件中，马云的“契约＂到底是什么？是让股东短期高兴一下但长期胆战心惊吗？如果你是马云，你会怎么做？搞个过渡协议然后天天跑北京去吃饭吗？万一吃饭无效怎么办？作为yhoo股东，我虽然短期帐目损失可观，但从长期的角度看，我是支持马云的。

Source: http://nteswjq.blog.163.com/blog/static/126998120115168499799/

Kung Fu Panda 3

> By Duan Yongping · his NetEase blog (nteswjq.blog.163.com, now closed; read from web archives) · 2011-06-16 · [Original link](http://nteswjq.blog.163.com/blog/static/126998120115168499799/) ([archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20110621010624/http://nteswjq.blog.163.com:80/blog/static/126998120115168499799/))

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5098b35f0100s1x3.html#

I'm travelling and it's not convenient to get on a computer, so I'll just write a few lines.

First, in the Alipay affair, what exactly was Jack Ma's "contract"? To make shareholders happy for a short while but frightened in the long run?

If you were Jack Ma, what would you do? Make a transitional agreement and then run to Beijing for dinners every day? What if the dinners don't work?

As a YHOO shareholder, although my short-term book loss is considerable, from a long-term perspective I support Jack Ma.

I'm very glad to see so many people starting to pay attention to the spirit of contract; it shows our society really has made huge progress.

But on the Alipay affair, shareholders who look at it with a long-term eye may see it completely differently. Of course, the bystanders' view doesn't matter either way; it won't cost you your life anyway.